Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair. |
| Authors: |
Bauerle, Wayne1, Franey, Daniel1, Allsbrook, Anthony1, Evans, Joseph1, Reese, Vanessa2, Stoltzfus, Jill2, Harrison, Meredith1, Burfeind, William1, Brown, Andrew M.1,3 Andrew.brown2@sluhn.org |
| Source: |
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques. Dec2024, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p7179-7186. 8p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*HERNIA surgery, *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery, *SURGICAL complications |
| Abstract: |
Introduction: Increased adoption of robotics in foregut surgery evokes questions regarding efficacy, safety, and cost. To many, cost remains a barrier to adoption of a robotic approach. The authors' aim to determine the difference in cost of a robotic (R-) vs laparoscopic (L-) approach for paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR). Methods: Patients 18 years and older who underwent PEHR between July 2016 and June 2021 at a university health network were included. Variables of interest included 30 day outcomes, 1 year recurrence rates, and several cost variables including hospital length of stay, operating room (OR) time, chargeable supplies and implants, non-chargeable supplies, and indirect cost. Cost data were stratified by type and the presence of fundoplication, as well as the elective versus urgent nature of the procedures. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric and non-parametric analyses, with p < 0.05 denoting statistical significance. Results: 405 patients were included in the study (n = 188 for R-, n = 217 for L-). Significant differences were observed in the type of anti-reflux procedure performed (p < 0.001), use of mesh (R- 70.2% vs. L- 59.0%, p = 0.019), and whether a Collis gastroplasty was performed (R- 4.3% vs. L- 10.2%, p = 0.023). No differences in 30-day readmission or reoperation rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rates, or 1-year hernia recurrence rates were observed. For elective cases, regardless of the type of anti-reflux procedure performed, a robotic approach was associated with a significantly greater cost (p < 0.002). Comparing all procedures, a statistically significant increase in cost was seen with a robotic approach (R- $29,706.88 vs. L- $23,457.07, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Complication rates and surgical outcomes between the two approaches were similar; however, cost is significantly increased when a robotic approach is utilized. Future studies are needed to delineate which drivers of cost are modifiable with the robot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
