Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Phase-Dependent Visual and Sensorimotor Integration of Features for Grasp Computations before and after Effector Specification. |
| Authors: |
Guo, Lin Lawrence1, Niemeier, Matthias1,2 m.niemeier@utoronto.ca |
| Source: |
Journal of Neuroscience. 8/14/2024, Vol. 44 Issue 33, p1-10. 10p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*PREHENSION (Physiology), *SENSORIMOTOR integration, *WRIST, *ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY |
| Abstract: |
The simple act of viewing and grasping an object involves complex sensorimotor control mechanisms that have been shown to vary as a function of multiple object and other task features such as object size, shape, weight, and wrist orientation. However, these features have been mostly studied in isolation. In contrast, given the nonlinearity of motor control, its computations require multiple features to be incorporated concurrently. Therefore, the present study tested the hypothesis that grasp computations integrate multiple task features superadditively in particular when these features are relevant for the same action phase. We asked male and female human participants to reach-to-grasp objects of different shapes and sizes with different wrist orientations. Also, we delayed the movement onset using auditory signals to specify which effector to use. Using electroencephalography and representative dissimilarity analysis to map the time course of cortical activity, we found that grasp computations formed superadditive integrated representations of grasp features during different planning phases of grasping. Shape-by-size representations and size-by-orientation representations occurred before and after effector specification, respectively, and could not be explained by single-feature models. These observations are consistent with the brain performing different preparatory, phase-specific computations; visual object analysis to identify grasp points at abstract visual levels; and downstream sensorimotor preparatory computations for reach-to-grasp trajectories. Our results suggest the brain adheres to the needs of nonlinear motor control for integration. Furthermore, they show that examining the superadditive influence of integrated representations can serve as a novel lens to map the computations underlying sensorimotor control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Neuroscience is the property of Society for Neuroscience and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
