Beyond the dichotomy of students-as-consumers and personal transformation: what students want from their degrees and their engagement with knowledge.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Beyond the dichotomy of students-as-consumers and personal transformation: what students want from their degrees and their engagement with knowledge.
Authors: Ashwin, Paul1 p.ashwin@lancaster.ac.uk, Goldschneider, Benjamin2, Agrawal, Ashish3, Smit, ReneƩ4
Source: Studies in Higher Education. Aug2024, Vol. 49 Issue 8, p1439-1450. 12p.
Subject Terms: *STUDENT engagement, *EDUCATIONAL planning, *PROJECT method in teaching, *QUALITATIVE research, UNDERGRADUATE education
Abstract: There is widespread concern that students are increasingly becoming passive consumers of education who primarily attend university to obtain the credentials they need for the labour market. To interrogate this view, a longitudinal qualitative study examined what 47 students in three countries wanted to get out of studying for their degree (their personal projects) and how these developed over the course of their undergraduate studies. Our analysis showed that whilst most students had instrumental reasons for studying, they tended to be personally committed to the knowledge they were studying and had a clear sense of the role it would play in their future lives. Where students did not see knowledge as having a key role in helping them to realise their personal projects, they were less likely to value their studies. Also, students who were committed to the knowledge they were studying but did not have a sense of what they were trying to achieve personally with it, appeared to be uncertain about where they were going by the end of their degree. Based on this analysis, we argue that the dichotomy between students-as-consumers and personal transformation is false. Rather what is important is students being clear about how academic knowledge connects them to the world and helps them to shape their plans for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Studies in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:03075079
DOI:10.1080/03075079.2023.2267589
Published in:Studies in Higher Education
Language:English