U-MET: Utility-Based Dose Optimization Approach for Multiple-Dose Randomized Trial Designs.

Bibliographic Details
Title: U-MET: Utility-Based Dose Optimization Approach for Multiple-Dose Randomized Trial Designs.
Authors: D’Angelo, Gina1 (AUTHOR) gina.dangelo@astrazeneca.com, Gong, Maozhen2 (AUTHOR), Marshall, Jayne2 (AUTHOR), Yuan, Ying3 (AUTHOR), Li, Xia2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. Jun2024, p1-11. 11p. 3 Illustrations, 9 Charts.
Abstract: AbstractThe advent of dose optimization has led to a paradigm shift in oncology clinical trials to find the optimal biologic dose (OBD). Phase 1/2 trials with randomized doses can facilitate additional investigation of the identified OBD in a targeted population by incorporating safety and efficacy data. We propose to compare randomized doses by extending the Bayesian optimal interval phase 1/2 (BOIN12) approach, an OBD-finding design in which a utility is used to account for risk-benefit tradeoffs. Specifically, we used the BOIN12 standardized mean utilities in a hypothesis testing framework, in which frequentist and Bayesian inference were evaluated to compare the standardized mean utilities across doses and identify the OBD. We performed simulation studies and a hypothetical oncology study to compare the proposed BOIN12 utility-based extension (U-MET) design with an empirical design. The results demonstrated that the U-MET design has satisfactory operating characteristics for selecting the OBD. We recommend using the U-MET design as the primary dose comparison approach, or alternatively as supportive evidence, for optimal dose selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:19466315
DOI:10.1080/19466315.2024.2365630
Published in:Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Language:English