Bibliographic Details
Title: |
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir versus sotrovimab for COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. |
Authors: |
Amani, Bahman1 (AUTHOR), Amani, Behnam1 (AUTHOR) b_amani@alumnus.tums.ac.ir |
Source: |
Immunity, Inflammation & Disease. Apr2024, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p1-11. 11p. |
Subject Terms: |
*MOLNUPIRAVIR, *CORONAVIRUS disease treatment, *COVID-19, *INTENSIVE care units |
Abstract: |
Background and Aim: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir and sotrovimab in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Methods: Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant evidence up to December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis (CMA). Results: Our search identified and included 13 studies involving 16166 patients. The meta‐analysis revealed a significant difference between the molnupiravir and sotrovimab groups in terms of the mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 3.70). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of hospitalization rate (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.06), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.81, 2.83), and intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.07, 4.84). In terms of safety, molnupiravir was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.30). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that sotrovimab may be more effective than molnupiravir in reducing the mortality rate in COVID‐19 patients. However, no statistical difference was observed between the two treatments for other effectiveness outcomes. The certainty of evidence for these findings was rated as low or moderate. Further research is required to provide a better comparison of these interventions in treating COVID‐19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Immunity, Inflammation & Disease is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|