Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Effects of protein concentration and beta-adrenergic agonists on ruminal bacterial communities in finishing beef heifers. |
| Authors: |
Pfau, Alison P.1 (AUTHOR), Henniger, Madison T.1 (AUTHOR), Samuelson, Kendall L.2 (AUTHOR), Hales, Kristin E.3 (AUTHOR), Löest, Clint A.4 (AUTHOR), Hubbert, Mike E.5 (AUTHOR), Lindholm-Perry, Amanda K.6 (AUTHOR), Egert-McLean, Amanda M.1 (AUTHOR), Mason, Katie M.1 (AUTHOR), Shepherd, Elizabeth A.1 (AUTHOR), Voy, Brynn H.1 (AUTHOR), Myer, Phillip R.1 (AUTHOR) pmyer@utk.edu |
| Source: |
PLoS ONE. 2/29/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p1-17. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*BACTERIAL communities, *HEIFERS, *BEEF cattle, *BEEF industry, *HYPERVARIABLE regions |
| Abstract: |
To improve animal performance and modify growth by increasing lean tissue accretion, beef cattle production has relied on use of growth promoting technologies such as beta-adrenergic agonists. These synthetic catecholamines, combined with the variable inclusion of rumen degradable (RDP) and undegradable protein (RUP), improve feed efficiency and rate of gain in finishing beef cattle. However, research regarding the impact of beta-adrenergic agonists, protein level, and source on the ruminal microbiome is limited. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different protein concentrations and beta-adrenergic agonist (ractopamine hydrochloride; RAC) on ruminal bacterial communities in finishing beef heifers. Heifers (n = 140) were ranked according to body weight and assigned to pens in a generalized complete block design with a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments of 6 different treatment combinations, containing 3 protein treatments (Control: 13.9% CP, 8.9% RDP, and 5.0% RUP; High RDP: 20.9% CP, 14.4% RDP, 6.5% RUP; or High RUP: 20.9% CP, 9.7% RDP, 11.2% RUP) and 2 RAC treatments (0 and 400 mg/day). Rumen samples were collected via orogastric tubing 7 days before harvest. DNA from rumen samples were sequenced to identify bacteria based on the V1-V3 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Reads from treatments were analyzed using the packages 'phyloseq' and 'dada2' within the R environment. Beta diversity was analyzed based on Bray-Curtis distances and was significantly different among protein and RAC treatments (P < 0.05). Alpha diversity metrics, such as Chao1 and Shannon diversity indices, were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Bacterial differences among treatments after analyses using PROC MIXED in SAS 9 were identified for the main effects of protein concentration (P < 0.05), rather than their interaction. These results suggest possible effects on microbial communities with different concentrations of protein but limited impact with RAC. However, both may potentially act synergistically to improve performance in finishing beef cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
