Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Standardizing Evidence-Based Practice Review Processes Across the Defense Health Agency Enterprise. |
| Authors: |
Newnam, Rachel1 (AUTHOR), Migliore, Laurie2 (AUTHOR), Ransom, Jeffrey C3 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Military Medicine. 2024 Supplement, Vol. 189, p39-44. 6p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*NURSING research, *AIR forces, *GROUP process, *REVIEW committees, *QUALITY assurance, *MEDICAL software |
| Company/Entity: |
MILITARY Health System (U.S.) , UNITED States Air Force Academy |
| Abstract: |
Background The Defense Health Agency (DHA) Campaign Plan identifies Ready Reliable Care (RRC) as one of the eight strategic initiatives. A critical aspect of RRC is standardizing evidence-based practice (EBP) across Military Health System to include training, technology, equipment, and processes. The TriService Nursing Research Program hosted an EBP Summit to address this expectation. Methods The EBP Summit evaluated capabilities and gaps critical for implementing EBP into the DHA. This article summarizes the capabilities and gaps associated with administrative processes and infrastructure standardization, specifically EBP review and approval support processes, as well as utilization of the electronic Institution Review Board (eIRB) software platform. Results The environmental scan across services revealed consistency in procuring Exempt Determination Official reviews and garnering formal determination letters before the start of EBP initiatives. The Army and Navy Nursing Centers for Clinical Inquiry report variability in the utilization of eIRB, although the Air Force centers consistently utilize eIRB to submit proposed EBP. However, there is variability across all services in how the proposal is categorized (EBP, process improvement, and quality assurance) and in the availability of mentoring support for the submission. Conclusion Strategic recommendations to address the identified gaps are establishing a TriService Clinical Inquiry Working Group for process and product standardization, identifying EBP champions for each DHA market to educate and facilitate EBP review and submission processes, and establishing EBP review forums led by EBP subject matter experts. The authors suggest funding for program development and evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Military Medicine is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
