Beyond coping: The role of supportive relationships and meaning making in youth well‐being.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Beyond coping: The role of supportive relationships and meaning making in youth well‐being.
Authors: Looman, Wendy S.1 looma003@umn.edu, Geiger‐Simpson, Elena1, Eull, Donna J.1, Lee, Jiwoo1, Nersesian, Paula V.2, Bell, Adrianna N.1, Miller, Angela L.1
Source: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. Nov2023, Vol. 55 Issue 6, p1189-1203. 15p.
Subject Terms: *PREVENTION of mental depression, *COMPETENCY assessment (Law), *MENTAL depression risk factors, *ADVERSE childhood experiences, *SOCIAL support, *RESEARCH methodology, *CROSS-sectional method, *TIME, *SELF-evaluation, *FAMILY support, *INTERVIEWING, *COMMUNITIES, *SOCIAL context, *ADOLESCENT health, *CRONBACH'S alpha, *RISK assessment, *INTERPERSONAL relations, *QUALITY of life, *HEALTH, *CHILDREN'S health, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *RESEARCH funding, *PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation, *DATA analysis software, *PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience, *CHILDREN, *ADOLESCENCE
Geographic Terms: MIDWEST (U.S.)
Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to identify coping strategies, resources, and strengths that predict well‐being in a community‐based sample of youth with varying levels of adversity. Design: Grounded in the resilience portfolio model, we used a mixed methods approach with data from a cross‐sectional sample of 231 youth ages 8–17. Materials and Methods: Data were collected using a survey, participant‐generated timeline activity, and brief interview. Measures included assessments of coping and appraisal, resilience resources and assets, and subjective well‐being and depression. Results: Active and passive coping strategies predicted subjective well‐being and depression. Controlling for demographics and coping, meaning making strengths and supportive relationships were significant predictors of subjective well‐being and lower depression, and decreased the impact of adversity on these outcomes. Discussion: The results of this study provide support for the resilience portfolio model in a community‐based sample of youth, with relationships as predicted for subjective well‐being and symptoms of depression. For both outcomes, family relationships held the strongest associations with positive well‐being and lower symptoms of depression. Supportive relationships with peers, meaning making strengths, interpersonal strengths, less passive coping, and fewer adverse life events were also associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need to assess youth resources and strengths and to design interventions that target these protective factors for all youth, regardless of exposure to adversity. Clinical Relevance: A theory‐informed understanding of resources and strengths that predict youth well‐being is essential to inform strengths‐based interventions for pediatric research and practice. The resilience portfolio model is a useful framework for understanding predictors of youth well‐being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Nursing Scholarship is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:15276546
DOI:10.1111/jnu.12901
Published in:Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Language:English