The Upemba National Park (Upper Congo Basin, DR Congo): An Updated Checklist Confirming Its Status as an African Fish Biodiversity Hotspot.

Bibliographic Details
Title: The Upemba National Park (Upper Congo Basin, DR Congo): An Updated Checklist Confirming Its Status as an African Fish Biodiversity Hotspot.
Authors: Katemo Manda, Bauchet1 (AUTHOR) katemok@unilu.ac.cd, Snoeks, Jos2,3 (AUTHOR) emmanuel.vreven@africamuseum.be, Chocha Manda, Auguste1 (AUTHOR) augustechocha@gmail.com, Abwe, Emmanuel1 (AUTHOR) emmanuelabwe@gmail.com, Mukweze Mulelenu, Christian1,2,3,4 (AUTHOR) christianmukwezemulelenu@gmail.com, Ilunga Kayaba, Micheline Kasongo1 (AUTHOR) michelinekasongo.k@gmail.com, Kiwele Mutambala, Pacifique1 (AUTHOR) kiwelefilspacifique@gmail.com, Ngoy Kalumba, Lewis1 (AUTHOR) lewiskalumba1@gmail.com, Vreven, Emmanuel J. W. M. N.2,3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Diversity (14242818). Sep2023, Vol. 15 Issue 9, p966. 35p.
Subject Terms: *NATIONAL parks & reserves, *PRESERVATION of parks, *FISH conservation, *SPECIES distribution, *GEOLOGIC hot spots
Geographic Terms: CONGO (Democratic Republic), CONGO River Watershed
Abstract: An annotated checklist of the ichthyofauna of the Upemba National Park, draining part of the Upper Lualaba basin and situated in the southern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, is presented, based on a literature review, a re-examination of museum collections, and a study of recent collections (2012–2020). In total, 247 native and 1 introduced species, Heterotis niloticus, are reported. The native species belong to 78 genera, 26 families, and 15 orders. Of these, 45 species (18%) are endemic to the park, 35 species (14%) await formal description, and 5 taxa (2%) need further study to clarify their status. With 51 species, the Cyprinidae is by far the most species-rich family, followed by the Mormyridae (26), Mochokidae (26), Alestidae (18), Distichodontidae (18), Amphiliidae (17), and Cichlidae (16). The remaining families are represented by less than 15 species. Comments about the species distribution and the fish fauna shared with adjacent ecoregions are provided. Although the park provides some protection for the fish species living within its borders by limiting human access to the core zone, the annex and buffer zones are both subject to strong anthropogenic pressure. These observations underscore the need for the implementation and further elaboration of fish-related preservation guidelines and plans to enable better protection/conservation of the park's ichthyofauna. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Diversity (14242818) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:14242818
DOI:10.3390/d15090966
Published in:Diversity (14242818)
Language:English