Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata incubation mounds as habitat for other vertebrates.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata incubation mounds as habitat for other vertebrates.
Authors: Neilly, Heather1 heathern@alt.org.au, Wells, David E.2, Pascoe, Tim3, Gillespie, Craig4, Cale, Peter1
Source: Australian Field Ornithology. 2021, Vol. 38, p99-106. 8p.
Subject Terms: *SOIL invertebrates, *BIRDS of prey, *CITIZEN science, *REPTILES, *SPECIES diversity, *HABITATS, *VERTEBRATES, *PREY availability
Abstract: Ecosystem engineers change the availability of resources for other species by forming new habitat or modifying existing habitat but, despite the diversity of avian ecosystem engineers, 80% of current literature focuses on mammals and invertebrates. Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata build large incubation mounds of soil and leaf-litter that are likely to provide habitat for invertebrates and vertebrates but use of their mounds by other vertebrates has never been quantified. Here, we examine vertebrate fauna visitation rates at Malleefowl mounds and non-mounds using camera-trap data collected by two citizen science projects. From 2012 to 2018, 20 active Malleefowl mounds and 16 non-mound sites were monitored over 31,913 hours and 225,144 hours, respectively. In total, we identified visits by 1724 birds, reptiles and mammals from 36 species. The mean number of vertebrate visits per 1000 hours of surveillance was around one and a half times and species richness five times that at mounds compared with non-mounds. Malleefowl mounds may enhance the availability of invertebrate prey for insectivorous birds and mammals, provide a favourable microclimate for reptiles to thermoregulate, and be signalling/social communication locations. Our results show that further research is warranted and suggest that conservation of Malleefowl may be important not only for the Malleefowl itself, but also for a suite of mallee birds and reptiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Australian Field Ornithology is the property of Birdlife Australia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:14480107
DOI:10.20938/afo38099106
Published in:Australian Field Ornithology
Language:English