Effects of Gain/Loss Frames on Telling Lies of Omission and Commission.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Effects of Gain/Loss Frames on Telling Lies of Omission and Commission.
Authors: van Swol, Lyn M.1 (AUTHOR) vanswol@wisc.edu, Polman, Evan2 (AUTHOR), Paik, Jihyun Esther3 (AUTHOR), Chang, Chen-Ting1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Cognition & Emotion. Nov2022, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p1287-1298. 12p. 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject Terms: *FAKE news, *DECEPTION
Company/Entity: UNITED States. Congress. Senate
Abstract: An increased focus on fake news and misinformation is currently emerging. But what does it mean when information is designated as "fake?" Research on deception has focused on lies of commission, in which people disclose something false as true. However, people can also lie by omission, by withholding important yet true information. In this research, we investigate when people are more likely to tell a lie of omission. In three studies, with tests among undergraduates, online sample respondents, and candidates for U.S. Senate, we found that people in a gain frame were more likely to lie by omission (vs. commission), and vice versa for a loss frame. Moreover, participants rated lies of commission in a gain frame as the least acceptable type of deception, suggesting why people may avoid telling this kind of lie. Overall, our results emphasize that from frame-to-frame, lying is not only different in degree but different in kind. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cognition & Emotion is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:02699931
DOI:10.1080/02699931.2022.2105307
Published in:Cognition & Emotion
Language:English