Trendelenburg Ventilation in Patients of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Poor Lung Compliance and Diaphragmatic Dysfunction.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Trendelenburg Ventilation in Patients of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Poor Lung Compliance and Diaphragmatic Dysfunction.
Authors: Kodamanchili, Saiteja1 saiteja306@gmail.com, Saigal, Saurabh2, Anand, Abhijeet1, Panda, Rajesh1, T. N., Priyanka3, Balakrishnan, Gowthaman Thatta1, Bhardwaj, Krishnkant1, Shrivatsav, Pranav1
Source: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. Mar2022, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p319-321. 3p. 2 Diagrams, 1 Chart.
Subject Terms: *ADULT respiratory distress syndrome treatment, *HEAD-down tilt position, *LUNGS, *RESPIRATORY measurements, *LUNG physiology, *DIAPHRAGM (Anatomy), *ARTIFICIAL respiration, *PATIENT positioning, *RESPIRATORY mechanics
Abstract: Background: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are generally ventilated in either 45° head elevation or prone position as they are associated with decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality, respectively. But in patients with poor lung compliance and super-added diaphragmatic weakness/dysfunction, generating a minimum amount of adequate tidal volume (TV) would be very difficult in propped up/supine/prone position, leading to worsening hypoxia and CO2 retention. We noticed a sustained increase in TV for patients with poor lung compliance (Cs <15 mL/cm H2O) and diaphragmatic dysfunction (bilateral diaphragmatic excursion <1 cm, on spontaneous breaths) when the patients are switched to Trendelenburg position with the same ventilator settings. Patients and methods: A case report with possible explanation for the observed changes has been mentioned. Results: Trendelenburg ventilation delivered more TV than propped up or prone ventilation in patients of ARDS with poor lung compliance and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Conclusion: Trendelenburg ventilation increases static lung compliance and delivers more TV when compared to propped up/supine/prone ventilation in patients of ARDS with poor lung compliance and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Although the exact mechanism behind this is not known till now, we formulated few theories that could explain the possible mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the property of Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Private Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:09725229
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24127
Published in:Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Language:English