Acupuncture and osteopathic medicine for atopic dermatitis: a three‐armed, randomized controlled explorative clinical trial.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Acupuncture and osteopathic medicine for atopic dermatitis: a three‐armed, randomized controlled explorative clinical trial.
Authors: Rotter, Gabriele1 (AUTHOR) gabriele.rotter@charite.de, Ahnert, Moritz W.1 (AUTHOR), Geue, Anne V.1 (AUTHOR), Icke, Katja1 (AUTHOR), Binting, Sylvia1 (AUTHOR), Tissen‐Diabaté, Tatjana1 (AUTHOR), Roll, Stephanie1 (AUTHOR), Ortiz, Miriam1 (AUTHOR), Reinhold, Thomas1 (AUTHOR), Kass, Benjamin1 (AUTHOR), Staab, Doris2 (AUTHOR), Pfab, Florian3 (AUTHOR), Willich, Stefan N.1 (AUTHOR), Brinkhaus, Benno1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Clinical & Experimental Dermatology. Dec2022, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p2166-2175. 10p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject Terms: *OSTEOPATHIC medicine, *CLINICAL trials, *ATOPIC dermatitis, *ACUPUNCTURE, *ACUPUNCTURE points, *ANALYSIS of covariance, *MOXIBUSTION
Abstract: Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently use acupuncture (ACU) and osteopathic medicine (OM), although their therapeutic benefits are unclear. Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of ACU and OM in patients with AD. Methods: In a three‐armed, single‐centre, randomized controlled open explorative clinical trial, adult patients with AD received ACU, OM or no study intervention (control group; CG) plus routine care. Outcomes included disease severity (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis; SCORAD), itching intensity (visual analogue scale; VAS), frequency of topical corticosteroid (TCS) use over 7 days and cost‐effectiveness. Endpoints were analysed by analysis of covariance adjusted for the respective baseline value and TCS use. Results: Overall, 121 patients (92 women, 29 men) with a mean ± SD age of 31.4 ± 10.5 years were randomized. After 12 weeks, the adjusted means (95% CI) for ACU, OM and control were, respectively, 22.3 (18.3–26.3), 26.4 (22.6–30.2) and 23.7 (19.9–27.5) for SCORAD (P = 0.32); 27.9 (19.5–36.4), 35.0 (26.9–43.0) and 42.3 (34.7–50.0) for VAS itching (P < 0.05); and 2.3 (0.8–3.9), 1.9 (0.4–3.5) and 4.3 (2.6–6.0), for TCS use (P = 0.10). ACU and OM were not cost‐effective compared with the CG. Conclusion: Although no differences in disease severity were found, our findings indicate that ACU might reduce itching in patients with AD. Furthermore, ACU and OM showed a trend towards reducing TCS use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:03076938
DOI:10.1111/ced.15340
Published in:Clinical & Experimental Dermatology
Language:English