Parsing Privilege: Does the Attorney–Client Privilege Attach to an Angry Client’s Criminal Threat Voiced During an Otherwise Privileged Attorney–Client Consultation?

Bibliographic Details
Title: Parsing Privilege: Does the Attorney–Client Privilege Attach to an Angry Client’s Criminal Threat Voiced During an Otherwise Privileged Attorney–Client Consultation?
Authors: Imwinkelried, Edward J.1
Source: Case Western Reserve Law Review. Summer2022, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p871-908. 38p.
Subject Terms: *ATTORNEY-client privilege, *ATTORNEY & client, *LEGAL ethics
Company/Entity: SIERRA Club , U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Abstract: The article focuses on how the U.S. Supreme Court added to its body of privilege jurisprudence when it rendered its decision in the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club. Inc., dealing with the deliberative-process privilege. It mentions history of the attorney-client privilege, it is surprising that one of the most fundamental questions relating to the privilege. It also mentions question of when it is appropriate for trial judges to exercise that power.
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:00087262
Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review
Language:English