Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Fratila and another v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53. |
| Authors: |
Fenton, Georgina1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Judicial Review. Mar2022, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p54-59. 6p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*MOTHER-child relationship, *VICTIMS of domestic violence, *APPELLATE courts |
| Abstract: |
1. In I Fratila and another v SSWP i ,[1] the Supreme Court determined the lawfulness of the Social Security (Income-related Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 ("the 2019 Regulations") following the judgment of the CJEU in I CG v Department for Communities in Northern Ireland i .[2] 2. Such an assessment is only necessary in cases where an EU citizen is unable to establish an EU law right to reside within the Citizens Rights Directive and is in an obviously "vulnerable situation". 3 ibid para 65. 4 Case C-181/19 I Jobcenter Krefeld-Widerspruchsstelle v JD i EU:C:2020:794, [78] 5 I CG i (n 2) para 66. 6 ibid para 67. 7 Case C-94/18 EU:C:2019:693, [2020] 1 WLR 1801, para 54. 8 I CG i (n 2) para 67. 9 ibid para 75. 10 Case C-333/13 EU:C:2014:2358, [2015] 1 WLR 2519, paras 68-69. 11 I CG i (n 2) para76. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Judicial Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
