| Title: |
Effect of liver transplantation on intestinal permeability and correlation with infection episodes. |
| Authors: |
Ponziani, Francesca Romana1 (AUTHOR) francesca.ponziani@gmail.com, Valenza, Venanzio2 (AUTHOR), Nure, Erida3 (AUTHOR), Bianco, Giuseppe3 (AUTHOR), Marrone, Giuseppe1 (AUTHOR), Grieco, Antonio1 (AUTHOR), Pompili, Maurizio1 (AUTHOR), Gasbarrini, Antonio1 (AUTHOR), Agnes, Salvatore3 (AUTHOR), Sganga, Gabriele4 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
PLoS ONE. 6/26/2020, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p1-11. 11p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*LIVER transplantation, *ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC acid, *PERMEABILITY, *CIRRHOSIS of the liver, *PATHOLOGY, *CHOLANGITIS |
| Abstract: |
Background: Liver cirrhosis has been known to be associated with increased intestinal permeability (IP); however, little is known about the modification of IP after liver transplantation (LT). The present study was aimed to assess IP after LT and evaluated its association with laboratory tests and clinical parameters, as well as with the development of infections. Methods: LT recipients were consecutively enrolled and compared with an equal number of patients with liver cirrhosis and healthy subjects. IP was assessed by urinary excretion of chromium-51 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA). Results: The median 51Cr-EDTA excretion was found to be higher in 35 LT recipients as compared with that in the healthy controls [4.77% (2.79–6.03) vs. 2.07% (1.57–2.42), p<0.0001], and comparable to that in the cirrhotic patients [3.69% (2.34–6.57), p = 0.445]. 51Cr-EDTA excretion was not associated with clinical variables, the type of immunosuppressive therapy, donor-related factors, comorbidities and incidence of infections [infection/no infection: 4.97% (3.14–7.03) vs 4.62% (2.79–5.82), p = 0.938]. Conclusion: LT recipients show an increased IP, similar to that in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, it is not associated with a high risk of infections. Further investigations into the pathogenesis of this persistent impairment of the intestinal barrier are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
