Methods of RNA preparation affect mRNA abundance quantification of reference genes in pig maturing oocytes.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Methods of RNA preparation affect mRNA abundance quantification of reference genes in pig maturing oocytes.
Authors: Wang, Y‐K1, Li, X1, Song, Z‐Q1, Yang, C‐X1 caixiayang@neau.edu.cn
Source: Reproduction in Domestic Animals. Oct2017, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p722-730. 9p.
Subject Terms: *SWINE embryology, *MESSENGER RNA, *POLYMERASE chain reaction, *GENE targeting, *GENE expression
Abstract: Contents To ensure accurate normalization and quantification of target RNA transcripts using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction ( RT- qPCR), most studies focus on the identification of stably expressed gene(s) as internal reference. However, RNA preparation methods could also be an important factor, especially for test samples of limited quantity (e.g. oocytes). In this study, we aimed to select appropriate reference gene(s), and evaluate the effect of RNA preparation methods on gene expression quantification in porcine oocytes and cumulus cells during in vitro maturation. Expression profiles of seven genes ( GAPDH, 18S, YWHAG, BACT, RPL4, HPRT1 and PPIA) were examined, on RNA samples extracted from cumulus cells ( RNeasy Kit) and oocytes ( RNeasy Kit and Lysis Kit) during in vitro maturation, respectively. Interestingly, different RNA preparation methods were found to potentially affect the quantification of reference gene expression in pig oocytes cultured in vitro. After geNorm analyses, the most suitable genes for normalization were identified, GAPDH/ 18S for cumulus cells and YWHAG/ BACT for oocytes, respectively. Thus, our results provide useful data and information on the selection of better reference genes and RNA preparation method for related functional studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Reproduction in Domestic Animals is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:09366768
DOI:10.1111/rda.12972
Published in:Reproduction in Domestic Animals
Language:English