Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices
Title: | Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices |
---|---|
Authors: | Leonardo Tozzi, Scott L. Fleming, Zachary D. Taylor, Cooper D. Raterink, Leanne M. Williams |
Source: | Network Neuroscience, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 925-945 (2020) |
Publisher Information: | The MIT Press, 2020. |
Publication Year: | 2020 |
Collection: | LCC:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
Subject Terms: | Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, RC321-571 |
More Details: | AbstractCountless studies have advanced our understanding of the human brain and its organization by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to derive network representations of human brain function. However, we do not know to what extent these “functional connectomes” are reliable over time. In a large public sample of healthy participants (N = 833) scanned on two consecutive days, we assessed the test-retest reliability of fMRI functional connectivity and the consequences on reliability of three common sources of variation in analysis workflows: atlas choice, global signal regression, and thresholding. By adopting the intraclass correlation coefficient as a metric, we demonstrate that only a small portion of the functional connectome is characterized by good (6–8%) to excellent (0.08–0.14%) reliability. Connectivity between prefrontal, parietal, and temporal areas is especially reliable, but also average connectivity within known networks has good reliability. In general, while unreliable edges are weak, reliable edges are not necessarily strong. Methodologically, reliability of edges varies between atlases, global signal regression decreases reliability for networks and most edges (but increases it for some), and thresholding based on connection strength reduces reliability. Focusing on the reliable portion of the connectome could help quantify brain trait-like features and investigate individual differences using functional neuroimaging. |
Document Type: | article |
File Description: | electronic resource |
Language: | English |
ISSN: | 2472-1751 |
Relation: | https://direct.mit.edu/netn/article/4/3/925/95843/Test-retest-reliability-of-the-human-functional; https://doaj.org/toc/2472-1751 |
DOI: | 10.1162/netn_a_00148 |
Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f |
Accession Number: | edsdoj.f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f |
Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:edsdoj&genre=article&issn=24721751&ISBN=&volume=4&issue=3&date=20200901&spage=925&pages=925-945&title=Network Neuroscience&atitle=Test-retest%20reliability%20of%20the%20human%20functional%20connectome%20over%20consecutive%20days%3A%20identifying%20highly%20reliable%20portions%20and%20assessing%20the%20impact%20of%20methodological%20choices&aulast=Leonardo%20Tozzi&id=DOI:10.1162/netn_a_00148 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries – Url: https://doaj.org/article/f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f Name: EDS - DOAJ (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: View record from DOAJ MouseOverText: View record from DOAJ |
---|---|
Header | DbId: edsdoj DbLabel: Directory of Open Access Journals An: edsdoj.f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f RelevancyScore: 943 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 942.722778320313 |
IllustrationInfo | |
Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leonardo+Tozzi%22">Leonardo Tozzi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott+L%2E+Fleming%22">Scott L. Fleming</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zachary+D%2E+Taylor%22">Zachary D. Taylor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooper+D%2E+Raterink%22">Cooper D. Raterink</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leanne+M%2E+Williams%22">Leanne M. Williams</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: Network Neuroscience, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 925-945 (2020) – Name: Publisher Label: Publisher Information Group: PubInfo Data: The MIT Press, 2020. – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Year Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: Subset Label: Collection Group: HoldingsInfo Data: LCC:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neurosciences%2E+Biological+psychiatry%2E+Neuropsychiatry%22">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RC321-571%22">RC321-571</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: AbstractCountless studies have advanced our understanding of the human brain and its organization by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to derive network representations of human brain function. However, we do not know to what extent these “functional connectomes” are reliable over time. In a large public sample of healthy participants (N = 833) scanned on two consecutive days, we assessed the test-retest reliability of fMRI functional connectivity and the consequences on reliability of three common sources of variation in analysis workflows: atlas choice, global signal regression, and thresholding. By adopting the intraclass correlation coefficient as a metric, we demonstrate that only a small portion of the functional connectome is characterized by good (6–8%) to excellent (0.08–0.14%) reliability. Connectivity between prefrontal, parietal, and temporal areas is especially reliable, but also average connectivity within known networks has good reliability. In general, while unreliable edges are weak, reliable edges are not necessarily strong. Methodologically, reliability of edges varies between atlases, global signal regression decreases reliability for networks and most edges (but increases it for some), and thresholding based on connection strength reduces reliability. Focusing on the reliable portion of the connectome could help quantify brain trait-like features and investigate individual differences using functional neuroimaging. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: article – Name: Format Label: File Description Group: SrcInfo Data: electronic resource – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2472-1751 – Name: NoteTitleSource Label: Relation Group: SrcInfo Data: https://direct.mit.edu/netn/article/4/3/925/95843/Test-retest-reliability-of-the-human-functional; https://doaj.org/toc/2472-1751 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1162/netn_a_00148 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doaj.org/article/f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f" linkWindow="_blank">https://doaj.org/article/f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: edsdoj.f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f |
PLink | https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.f20df2bdfc254921895b27f5097d494f |
RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1162/netn_a_00148 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 925 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Type: general – SubjectFull: RC321-571 Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leonardo Tozzi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Scott L. Fleming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zachary D. Taylor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cooper D. Raterink – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leanne M. Williams IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 24721751 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 4 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Network Neuroscience Type: main |
ResultId | 1 |