Establishment and validation of an individualized macrophage-related gene signature to predict overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer

Bibliographic Details
Title: Establishment and validation of an individualized macrophage-related gene signature to predict overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer
Authors: Peng Su, Ziqi Peng, Boyang Xu, Bowen Yang, Feng Jin
Source: PeerJ, Vol 9, p e12383 (2021)
Publisher Information: PeerJ Inc., 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Biology (General)
Subject Terms: Triple negative breast Cancer, Macrophages, Nomogram, Tumor microenvironment, Vinorelbine, Medicine, Biology (General), QH301-705.5
More Details: Background Recently, researchers have classified highly heterogeneous triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) into different subtypes from different perspectives and investigated the characteristics of different subtypes to pursue individualized treatment. With the increase of immunotherapy and its preliminary application in TNBC treatment, the value of immune-related strategies in the treatment of TNBC has been initially reflected. Based thereon, this study plans to classify and further explore TNBC from the perspective of immune cell infiltration. Method The fractions of immune cells of TNBC patients were assessed by six immune component analysis methods in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Hub genes significantly related to poor prognosis were verified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis, Lasso analysis, and univariate KM analysis. Two cohorts of TNBC patients with complete prognosis information were collected for validation analysis. Finally, the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database was adopted to ascertain the sensitivity differences of different populations based on hub-gene grouping to different chemotherapy drugs. Results Five hub genes (CD79A, CXCL13, IGLL5, LHFPL2, and PLEKHF1) of the key co-expression gene module could divide TNBC patients into two groups (Cluster A and Cluster B) based on consistency cluster analysis. The patients with Cluster A were responsible for significantly worse prognosis than the patients with Cluster B (P = 0.023). In addition, another classification method, PCoA, and two other datasets (GSE103091 and GSE76124), were used to obtain consistent results with previous findings, which verified the stability of the classification method and dataset in this study. The grouping criteria based on the previous results were developed and the accuracy of the cut-off values was validated. A prognosis model of TNBC patients was then constructed based on the grouping results of five hub genes and N staging as prognostic factors. The results of ROC and decision curve analyses showed that this model had high prediction accuracy and patients could benefit therefrom. Finally, GDSC database analysis proved that patients in Cluster A were more sensitive to Vinorelbine. Separate analysis of the sensitivity of patients in Cluster A to Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine showed that the patients in Cluster A exhibited higher sensitivity to Vinorelbine. We hypothesized that these five genes were related to gemcitabine resistance and they could serve as biomarkers for clinical drug decision-making after anthracene resistance and taxane resistance in patients with advanced TNBC. Conclusion This study found five hub prognostic genes associated with macrophages, and a prognostic model was established to predict the survival of TNBC patients. Finally, these five genes were related to gemcitabine resistance in TNBC patients.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2167-8359
Relation: https://peerj.com/articles/12383.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/12383/; https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12383
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
Accession Number: edsdoj.b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:edsdoj&genre=article&issn=21678359&ISBN=&volume=9&issue=&date=20211101&spage=e12383&pages=&title=PeerJ&atitle=Establishment%20and%20validation%20of%20an%20individualized%20macrophage-related%20gene%20signature%20to%20predict%20overall%20survival%20in%20patients%20with%20triple%20negative%20breast%20cancer&aulast=Peng%20Su&id=DOI:10.7717/peerj.12383
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries
    MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries
  – Url: https://doaj.org/article/b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
    Name: EDS - DOAJ (s8985755)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from DOAJ
    MouseOverText: View record from DOAJ
Header DbId: edsdoj
DbLabel: Directory of Open Access Journals
An: edsdoj.b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
RelevancyScore: 932
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 931.677795410156
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Establishment and validation of an individualized macrophage-related gene signature to predict overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peng+Su%22">Peng Su</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ziqi+Peng%22">Ziqi Peng</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boyang+Xu%22">Boyang Xu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bowen+Yang%22">Bowen Yang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Feng+Jin%22">Feng Jin</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: PeerJ, Vol 9, p e12383 (2021)
– Name: Publisher
  Label: Publisher Information
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: PeerJ Inc., 2021.
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Year
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: Subset
  Label: Collection
  Group: HoldingsInfo
  Data: LCC:Medicine<br />LCC:Biology (General)
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Triple+negative+breast+Cancer%22">Triple negative breast Cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Macrophages%22">Macrophages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nomogram%22">Nomogram</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tumor+microenvironment%22">Tumor microenvironment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vinorelbine%22">Vinorelbine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medicine%22">Medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology+%28General%29%22">Biology (General)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22QH301-705%2E5%22">QH301-705.5</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background Recently, researchers have classified highly heterogeneous triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) into different subtypes from different perspectives and investigated the characteristics of different subtypes to pursue individualized treatment. With the increase of immunotherapy and its preliminary application in TNBC treatment, the value of immune-related strategies in the treatment of TNBC has been initially reflected. Based thereon, this study plans to classify and further explore TNBC from the perspective of immune cell infiltration. Method The fractions of immune cells of TNBC patients were assessed by six immune component analysis methods in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Hub genes significantly related to poor prognosis were verified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis, Lasso analysis, and univariate KM analysis. Two cohorts of TNBC patients with complete prognosis information were collected for validation analysis. Finally, the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database was adopted to ascertain the sensitivity differences of different populations based on hub-gene grouping to different chemotherapy drugs. Results Five hub genes (CD79A, CXCL13, IGLL5, LHFPL2, and PLEKHF1) of the key co-expression gene module could divide TNBC patients into two groups (Cluster A and Cluster B) based on consistency cluster analysis. The patients with Cluster A were responsible for significantly worse prognosis than the patients with Cluster B (P = 0.023). In addition, another classification method, PCoA, and two other datasets (GSE103091 and GSE76124), were used to obtain consistent results with previous findings, which verified the stability of the classification method and dataset in this study. The grouping criteria based on the previous results were developed and the accuracy of the cut-off values was validated. A prognosis model of TNBC patients was then constructed based on the grouping results of five hub genes and N staging as prognostic factors. The results of ROC and decision curve analyses showed that this model had high prediction accuracy and patients could benefit therefrom. Finally, GDSC database analysis proved that patients in Cluster A were more sensitive to Vinorelbine. Separate analysis of the sensitivity of patients in Cluster A to Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine showed that the patients in Cluster A exhibited higher sensitivity to Vinorelbine. We hypothesized that these five genes were related to gemcitabine resistance and they could serve as biomarkers for clinical drug decision-making after anthracene resistance and taxane resistance in patients with advanced TNBC. Conclusion This study found five hub prognostic genes associated with macrophages, and a prognostic model was established to predict the survival of TNBC patients. Finally, these five genes were related to gemcitabine resistance in TNBC patients.
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: article
– Name: Format
  Label: File Description
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: electronic resource
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2167-8359
– Name: NoteTitleSource
  Label: Relation
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: https://peerj.com/articles/12383.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/12383/; https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.7717/peerj.12383
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doaj.org/article/b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca" linkWindow="_blank">https://doaj.org/article/b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca</link>
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: edsdoj.b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
PLink https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.b0fc2fc110e84301b96bd81c5a68a4ca
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.7717/peerj.12383
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: e12383
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Triple negative breast Cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Macrophages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nomogram
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tumor microenvironment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vinorelbine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medicine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biology (General)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: QH301-705.5
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Establishment and validation of an individualized macrophage-related gene signature to predict overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peng Su
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ziqi Peng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boyang Xu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bowen Yang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Feng Jin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21678359
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: PeerJ
              Type: main
ResultId 1