Model-Informed Development of a Cost-Saving Dosing Regimen for Sacituzumab Govitecan.

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Model-Informed Development of a Cost-Saving Dosing Regimen for Sacituzumab Govitecan.
Authors:	Moes, Dirk J. A. R., Hendrikx, Jeroen J. M. A., Guchelaar, Henk-Jan, Mathijssen, Ron H. J., Bakker, J. L., Dezentjé, Vincent O., de Rouw, Nikki, van Erp, Nielka P., Smit, Egbert F., van den Heuvel, Michel M., Munnink, Thijs H. Oude, van Kats, Maartje, Croes, Sander, Kroep, Judith R., Zwaveling, Juliette, ter Heine, Rob
Source:	Targeted Oncology; Sep2024, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p789-796, 8p
Abstract:	Background: The antibody–drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan is approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and has shown promising results in various other types of cancer. Its costs may limit patient access to this novel effective treatment modality. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop an evidence-based rational dosing regimen that results in targeted drug exposure within the therapeutic range while minimizing financial toxicity, to improve treatment access. Patients and Methods: Exposure equivalent dosing strategies were developed based on pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation by using the published pharmacokinetic model developed by the license holder. The alternative dose was based on the principle of using complete vials to prevent spillage and on the established non-linear relationship between body weight and systemic exposure. Equivalent exposure compared to the approved dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg was aimed for. Equivalent exposure was conservatively defined as calculated geometric mean ratios within the 0.9–1.11 boundaries for area under the concentration–time curve (AUC), trough concentration (Ctrough) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of the alternative dosing regimen compared to the approved dosing regimen. Since different vial sizes are available for the European Union (EU) and United States (US) market, because body weight distributions differ between these populations, we performed our analysis for both scenarios. Results: Dosing regimens of sacituzumab govitecan for the EU (< 50 kg: 400 mg, 50–80 kg: 600 mg, and > 80 kg: 800 mg) and US population (< 40 kg: 360 mg, 40–65 kg: 540 mg, 65–90 kg: 720 mg, and > 90 kg: 900 mg) were developed, based on weight bands. The geometric mean ratios for all pharmacokinetic outcomes were within the predefined equivalence boundaries, while the quantity of drug used was 21.5% and 19.0% lower for the EU and US scenarios, respectively. Conclusions: With the alternative dosing proposal, an approximately 20% reduction in drug expenses for sacituzumab govitecan can be realized while maintaining an equivalent and more evenly distributed exposure throughout the body weight range, without notable increases in pharmacokinetic variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Targeted Oncology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Complementary Index

Be the first to leave a comment!