Academic Journal
View in EDS

Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses.
Authors: van Baarle, Floor L. F., van de Weerdt, Emma K., Raasveld, S. Jorinde, Vlaar, Alexander P. J., Biemond, Bart J., van der Velden, Walter J. F. M., Ruiterkamp, Roelof A., Tuinman, Pieter R., Ypma, Paula F., van den Bergh, Walter M., Demandt, Astrid M. P., Kerver, Emile D., Jansen, A. J. Gerard, Westerweel, Peter E., Arbous, M. Sesmu, Determann, Rogier M., van Mook, Walther N. K. A., Koeman, Mirelle, Mäkelburg, Anja B. U., van Lienden, Krijn P.
Source: Transfusion; Aug2024, Vol. 64 Issue 8, p1414-1420, 7p
Subject Terms: CENTRAL venous catheterization, CENTRAL venous catheters, INTER-observer reliability, ODDS ratio, RETROSPECTIVE studies
Abstract: Background: Reported bleeding incidences following central venous catheter (CVC) placement highly depend on methods of bleeding assessment. To determine the direction and magnitude of the bias associated with retrospective data collection, we used data from the PACER randomized controlled trial and a previous retrospective cohort study. Study Design and Methods: A patient‐level comparison of CVC‐related bleeding severity was made among (1) the prospectively collected clinical bleeding assessment of the PACER trial, (2) centralized assessment of CVC insertion site photographs, and (3) retrospective chart review. Interrater reliability for photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review was assessed using Cohen's κ. The magnitude of underreporting of both methods compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment at different cutoff points of clinically relevant bleeding was assessed using McNemar's test. Results: Interrater reliability was acceptable for both methods (κ = 0.583 and κ = 0.481 for photographic assessment and retrospective chart review, respectively). Photographic bleeding assessment led to significant underreporting of bleeding complications at all cutoff points. Retrospective chart review led to significant underreporting of minor bleeding complications, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.17 (0.044–0.51) for the cutoff point grade 1 (i.e., self‐limiting or requiring at most 20 min of manual compression) or higher. There was no significant underreporting of major bleeding complications with retrospective chart review. Discussion: Centralized photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review lead to biased bleeding assessment compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Transfusion is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
FullText Links:
  – Type: other
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:edb&genre=article&issn=00411132&ISBN=&volume=64&issue=8&date=20240801&spage=1414&pages=1414-1420&title=Transfusion&atitle=Bleeding%20assessment%20following%20central%20venous%20catheter%20placement%2C%20a%20direct%20comparison%20of%20prospective%20and%20retrospective%20analyses.&aulast=van%20Baarle%2C%20Floor%20L.%20F.&id=DOI:10.1111/trf.17930
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries
    MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries
Header DbId: edb
DbLabel: Complementary Index
An: 178945240
RelevancyScore: 1041
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1040.51647949219
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Baarle%2C+Floor+L%2E+F%2E%22">van Baarle, Floor L. F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+de+Weerdt%2C+Emma+K%2E%22">van de Weerdt, Emma K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raasveld%2C+S%2E+Jorinde%22">Raasveld, S. Jorinde</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vlaar%2C+Alexander+P%2E+J%2E%22">Vlaar, Alexander P. J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Biemond%2C+Bart+J%2E%22">Biemond, Bart J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Velden%2C+Walter+J%2E+F%2E+M%2E%22">van der Velden, Walter J. F. M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruiterkamp%2C+Roelof+A%2E%22">Ruiterkamp, Roelof A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tuinman%2C+Pieter+R%2E%22">Tuinman, Pieter R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ypma%2C+Paula+F%2E%22">Ypma, Paula F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+den+Bergh%2C+Walter+M%2E%22">van den Bergh, Walter M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Demandt%2C+Astrid+M%2E+P%2E%22">Demandt, Astrid M. P.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kerver%2C+Emile+D%2E%22">Kerver, Emile D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jansen%2C+A%2E+J%2E+Gerard%22">Jansen, A. J. Gerard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Westerweel%2C+Peter+E%2E%22">Westerweel, Peter E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Arbous%2C+M%2E+Sesmu%22">Arbous, M. Sesmu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Determann%2C+Rogier+M%2E%22">Determann, Rogier M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Mook%2C+Walther+N%2E+K%2E+A%2E%22">van Mook, Walther N. K. A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koeman%2C+Mirelle%22">Koeman, Mirelle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mäkelburg%2C+Anja+B%2E+U%2E%22">Mäkelburg, Anja B. U.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Lienden%2C+Krijn+P%2E%22">van Lienden, Krijn P.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: Transfusion; Aug2024, Vol. 64 Issue 8, p1414-1420, 7p
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CENTRAL+venous+catheterization%22">CENTRAL venous catheterization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CENTRAL+venous+catheters%22">CENTRAL venous catheters</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22INTER-observer+reliability%22">INTER-observer reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ODDS+ratio%22">ODDS ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RETROSPECTIVE+studies%22">RETROSPECTIVE studies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Reported bleeding incidences following central venous catheter (CVC) placement highly depend on methods of bleeding assessment. To determine the direction and magnitude of the bias associated with retrospective data collection, we used data from the PACER randomized controlled trial and a previous retrospective cohort study. Study Design and Methods: A patient‐level comparison of CVC‐related bleeding severity was made among (1) the prospectively collected clinical bleeding assessment of the PACER trial, (2) centralized assessment of CVC insertion site photographs, and (3) retrospective chart review. Interrater reliability for photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review was assessed using Cohen's κ. The magnitude of underreporting of both methods compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment at different cutoff points of clinically relevant bleeding was assessed using McNemar's test. Results: Interrater reliability was acceptable for both methods (κ = 0.583 and κ = 0.481 for photographic assessment and retrospective chart review, respectively). Photographic bleeding assessment led to significant underreporting of bleeding complications at all cutoff points. Retrospective chart review led to significant underreporting of minor bleeding complications, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.17 (0.044–0.51) for the cutoff point grade 1 (i.e., self‐limiting or requiring at most 20 min of manual compression) or higher. There was no significant underreporting of major bleeding complications with retrospective chart review. Discussion: Centralized photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review lead to biased bleeding assessment compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Transfusion is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edb&AN=178945240
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/trf.17930
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 1414
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: CENTRAL venous catheterization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CENTRAL venous catheters
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: INTER-observer reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: ODDS ratio
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RETROSPECTIVE studies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Baarle, Floor L. F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van de Weerdt, Emma K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Raasveld, S. Jorinde
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Biemond, Bart J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Velden, Walter J. F. M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ruiterkamp, Roelof A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tuinman, Pieter R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ypma, Paula F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van den Bergh, Walter M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Demandt, Astrid M. P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kerver, Emile D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jansen, A. J. Gerard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Westerweel, Peter E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Arbous, M. Sesmu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Determann, Rogier M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koeman, Mirelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mäkelburg, Anja B. U.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Lienden, Krijn P.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00411132
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 64
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Transfusion
              Type: main
ResultId 1