Turnaway Study Report Unethically Violated Participants’ Privacy and Misleads Public with a Non-Representative Sample, Selective Reporting, and Overstated Conclusions.
| Title: | Turnaway Study Report Unethically Violated Participants’ Privacy and Misleads Public with a Non-Representative Sample, Selective Reporting, and Overstated Conclusions. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Reardon, David C.1 dreardon@lozierinstitute.org |
| Source: | Issues in Law & Medicine. Fall2024, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p140-169. 30p. |
| Subject Terms: | *HEALTH services accessibility, *MEDICALLY underserved areas, *REPRODUCTIVE health, *HUMAN research subjects, *PRIVACY, *RESPONSIBILITY, *MEDICAL research, *ACQUISITION of data, *INFORMED consent (Medical law), *MEDICAL ethics, *RESEARCH ethics, *ABORTION |
| Abstract: | Results from the Turnaway Study, conducted by Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSRH), have widely been represented as definitive proof that women denied access to abortion will suffer severe injury to their health and economic wellbeing. Yet a careful examination reveals that the study is based on a non-random, non-representative sample of women that grossly underrepresents the experiences of the majority of women undergoing abortions. In addition, a reanalysis of its reported results reveal that the effect size of the outcomes observed have been grossly overstated, leading to conclusions that are not supported by the results. There also appears to be selective reporting and misrepresentation of results previously published. In addition, inconsistencies in ANSRH’s published record strongly suggest that the credit history reports of the Turnaway Study participants were obtained without their informed consent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Issues in Law & Medicine is the property of Issues in Law & Medicine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Academic Search Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:a9h&genre=article&issn=87568160&ISBN=&volume=39&issue=2&date=20240901&spage=140&pages=140-169&title=Issues in Law & Medicine&atitle=Turnaway%20Study%20Report%20Unethically%20Violated%20Participants%E2%80%99%20Privacy%20and%20Misleads%20Public%20with%20a%20Non-Representative%20Sample%2C%20Selective%20Reporting%2C%20and%20Overstated%20Conclusions.&aulast=Reardon%2C%20David%20C.&id=DOI:10.70257/twgf1217 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: a9h DbLabel: Academic Search Complete An: 180778236 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Turnaway Study Report Unethically Violated Participants’ Privacy and Misleads Public with a Non-Representative Sample, Selective Reporting, and Overstated Conclusions. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reardon%2C+David+C%2E%22">Reardon, David C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> dreardon@lozierinstitute.org</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Issues+in+Law+%26+Medicine%22">Issues in Law & Medicine</searchLink>. Fall2024, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p140-169. 30p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22HEALTH+services+accessibility%22">HEALTH services accessibility</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDICALLY+underserved+areas%22">MEDICALLY underserved areas</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22REPRODUCTIVE+health%22">REPRODUCTIVE health</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22HUMAN+research+subjects%22">HUMAN research subjects</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22PRIVACY%22">PRIVACY</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESPONSIBILITY%22">RESPONSIBILITY</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDICAL+research%22">MEDICAL research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ACQUISITION+of+data%22">ACQUISITION of data</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22INFORMED+consent+%28Medical+law%29%22">INFORMED consent (Medical law)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDICAL+ethics%22">MEDICAL ethics</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+ethics%22">RESEARCH ethics</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ABORTION%22">ABORTION</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Results from the Turnaway Study, conducted by Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSRH), have widely been represented as definitive proof that women denied access to abortion will suffer severe injury to their health and economic wellbeing. Yet a careful examination reveals that the study is based on a non-random, non-representative sample of women that grossly underrepresents the experiences of the majority of women undergoing abortions. In addition, a reanalysis of its reported results reveal that the effect size of the outcomes observed have been grossly overstated, leading to conclusions that are not supported by the results. There also appears to be selective reporting and misrepresentation of results previously published. In addition, inconsistencies in ANSRH’s published record strongly suggest that the credit history reports of the Turnaway Study participants were obtained without their informed consent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Issues in Law & Medicine is the property of Issues in Law & Medicine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=a9h&AN=180778236 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.70257/twgf1217 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 30 StartPage: 140 Subjects: – SubjectFull: HEALTH services accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDICALLY underserved areas Type: general – SubjectFull: REPRODUCTIVE health Type: general – SubjectFull: HUMAN research subjects Type: general – SubjectFull: PRIVACY Type: general – SubjectFull: RESPONSIBILITY Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDICAL research Type: general – SubjectFull: ACQUISITION of data Type: general – SubjectFull: INFORMED consent (Medical law) Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDICAL ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: RESEARCH ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: ABORTION Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Turnaway Study Report Unethically Violated Participants’ Privacy and Misleads Public with a Non-Representative Sample, Selective Reporting, and Overstated Conclusions. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Reardon, David C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Fall2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 87568160 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Issues in Law & Medicine Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |