Comparison between proactive and retroactive models of medication reconciliation in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.
Title: | Comparison between proactive and retroactive models of medication reconciliation in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. |
---|---|
Authors: | Ahmadimoghaddam, Davoud1, Akbari, Paniz2, Mehrpooya, Maryam2 m_mehrpooya2003@yahoo.com, Entezari-Maleki, Taher3 m_mehrpooya2003@yahoo.com, Rangchian, Maryam2, Zamanirafe, Maryam4, Parvaneh, Erfan5, Mohammadi, Younes6 |
Source: | International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. 2024, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p143-158. 16p. |
Subject Terms: | *MEDICATION errors, *ACADEMIC medical centers, *RESEARCH funding, *MEDICATION reconciliation, *HEART failure, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *LONGITUDINAL method, *MATHEMATICAL models, *RESEARCH methodology, *THEORY, *HOSPITAL pharmacies, *NONPRESCRIPTION drugs |
Geographic Terms: | IRAN |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Most research on the impact of medication reconciliation on patient safety focused on the retroactive model, with limited attention given to the proactive model. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the proactive and retroactive models in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: This prospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted over six months, from June to November 2022, at the cardiology unit of an academic hospital in Iran. Eligible patients were those hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure using a minimum of five regular medications before admission. Medication reconciliation was performed in 81 cases using the proactive model and in 81 using the retroactive model. RESULTS: 556 medications were reconciled using the retroactive model, and 581 were reconciled using the proactive model. In the retroactive cases, 341 discrepancies (both intentional and unintentional) were identified, compared to 231 in the proactive cases. The proportion of patients with at least one unintentional discrepancy was significantly lower in the proactive cases than in the retroactive cases (23.80% versus 74.03%). Moreover, the number of unintentional discrepancies was significantly lower in the proactive cases compared to the retroactive cases (22 out of 231 discrepancies versus 150 out of 341 discrepancies). In the retroactive cases, medication omission was the most frequent type of unintentional discrepancy (44.00). About, 42.70% of reconciliation errors detected in the retroactive cases were judged to have the potential to cause moderate to severe harm. While the average time spent obtaining medication history was similar in both models (00:27 [h: min] versus 00:30), the average time needed to complete the entire process was significantly shorter in the proactive model compared to the retroactive model (00:41 min versus 00:51). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that the proactive model is a timely and effective method of medication reconciliation, particularly in improving medication safety for high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Copyright of International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
Database: | Academic Search Complete |
Full text is not displayed to guests. | Login for full access. |
FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:a9h&genre=article&issn=09246479&ISBN=&volume=35&issue=2&date=20240401&spage=143&pages=143-158&title=International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine&atitle=Comparison%20between%20proactive%20and%20retroactive%20models%20of%20medication%20reconciliation%20in%20patients%20hospitalized%20for%20acute%20decompensated%20heart%20failure.&aulast=Ahmadimoghaddam%2C%20Davoud&id=DOI:10.3233/JRS-230034 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries |
---|---|
Header | DbId: a9h DbLabel: Academic Search Complete An: 177635026 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
IllustrationInfo | |
Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparison between proactive and retroactive models of medication reconciliation in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ahmadimoghaddam%2C+Davoud%22">Ahmadimoghaddam, Davoud</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Akbari%2C+Paniz%22">Akbari, Paniz</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mehrpooya%2C+Maryam%22">Mehrpooya, Maryam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> m_mehrpooya2003@yahoo.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Entezari-Maleki%2C+Taher%22">Entezari-Maleki, Taher</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><i> m_mehrpooya2003@yahoo.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rangchian%2C+Maryam%22">Rangchian, Maryam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zamanirafe%2C+Maryam%22">Zamanirafe, Maryam</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Parvaneh%2C+Erfan%22">Parvaneh, Erfan</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mohammadi%2C+Younes%22">Mohammadi, Younes</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Risk+%26+Safety+in+Medicine%22">International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine</searchLink>. 2024, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p143-158. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDICATION+errors%22">MEDICATION errors</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ACADEMIC+medical+centers%22">ACADEMIC medical centers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+funding%22">RESEARCH funding</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDICATION+reconciliation%22">MEDICATION reconciliation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22HEART+failure%22">HEART failure</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22DESCRIPTIVE+statistics%22">DESCRIPTIVE statistics</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22LONGITUDINAL+method%22">LONGITUDINAL method</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MATHEMATICAL+models%22">MATHEMATICAL models</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+methodology%22">RESEARCH methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22THEORY%22">THEORY</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22HOSPITAL+pharmacies%22">HOSPITAL pharmacies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22NONPRESCRIPTION+drugs%22">NONPRESCRIPTION drugs</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22IRAN%22">IRAN</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: BACKGROUND: Most research on the impact of medication reconciliation on patient safety focused on the retroactive model, with limited attention given to the proactive model. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the proactive and retroactive models in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: This prospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted over six months, from June to November 2022, at the cardiology unit of an academic hospital in Iran. Eligible patients were those hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure using a minimum of five regular medications before admission. Medication reconciliation was performed in 81 cases using the proactive model and in 81 using the retroactive model. RESULTS: 556 medications were reconciled using the retroactive model, and 581 were reconciled using the proactive model. In the retroactive cases, 341 discrepancies (both intentional and unintentional) were identified, compared to 231 in the proactive cases. The proportion of patients with at least one unintentional discrepancy was significantly lower in the proactive cases than in the retroactive cases (23.80% versus 74.03%). Moreover, the number of unintentional discrepancies was significantly lower in the proactive cases compared to the retroactive cases (22 out of 231 discrepancies versus 150 out of 341 discrepancies). In the retroactive cases, medication omission was the most frequent type of unintentional discrepancy (44.00). About, 42.70% of reconciliation errors detected in the retroactive cases were judged to have the potential to cause moderate to severe harm. While the average time spent obtaining medication history was similar in both models (00:27 [h: min] versus 00:30), the average time needed to complete the entire process was significantly shorter in the proactive model compared to the retroactive model (00:41 min versus 00:51). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that the proactive model is a timely and effective method of medication reconciliation, particularly in improving medication safety for high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
PLink | https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=a9h&AN=177635026 |
RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.3233/JRS-230034 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 143 Subjects: – SubjectFull: IRAN Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDICATION errors Type: general – SubjectFull: ACADEMIC medical centers Type: general – SubjectFull: RESEARCH funding Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDICATION reconciliation Type: general – SubjectFull: HEART failure Type: general – SubjectFull: DESCRIPTIVE statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: LONGITUDINAL method Type: general – SubjectFull: MATHEMATICAL models Type: general – SubjectFull: RESEARCH methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: THEORY Type: general – SubjectFull: HOSPITAL pharmacies Type: general – SubjectFull: NONPRESCRIPTION drugs Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparison between proactive and retroactive models of medication reconciliation in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ahmadimoghaddam, Davoud – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Akbari, Paniz – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mehrpooya, Maryam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Entezari-Maleki, Taher – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rangchian, Maryam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zamanirafe, Maryam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Parvaneh, Erfan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mohammadi, Younes IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: 2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09246479 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine Type: main |
ResultId | 1 |