Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.
Authors: Itthipuripat, Sirawaj1 itthipuripat.sirawaj@gmail.com, Cha, Kexin2, Byers, Anna2, Serences, John T.1,2,3 jserences@ucsd.edu
Source: PLoS Biology. 6/27/2017, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p1-38. 38p. 2 Diagrams, 2 Charts, 9 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *PSYCHOLOGY, *SOCIAL sciences, *SENSORY perception, *NOISE control, *SIGNAL processing
Abstract: Selective attention supports the prioritized processing of relevant sensory information to facilitate goal-directed behavior. Studies in human subjects demonstrate that attentional gain of cortical responses can sufficiently account for attention-related improvements in behavior. On the other hand, studies using highly trained nonhuman primates suggest that reductions in neural noise can better explain attentional facilitation of behavior. Given the importance of selective information processing in nearly all domains of cognition, we sought to reconcile these competing accounts by testing the hypothesis that extensive behavioral training alters the neural mechanisms that support selective attention. We tested this hypothesis using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure stimulus-evoked visual responses from human subjects while they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of ~1 month. Early in training, spatial attention led to an increase in the gain of stimulus-evoked visual responses. Gain was apparent within ~100 ms of stimulus onset, and a quantitative model based on signal detection theory (SDT) successfully linked the magnitude of this gain modulation to attention-related improvements in behavior. However, after extensive training, this early attentional gain was eliminated even though there were still substantial attention-related improvements in behavior. Accordingly, the SDT-based model required noise reduction to account for the link between the stimulus-evoked visual responses and attentional modulations of behavior. These findings suggest that training can lead to fundamental changes in the way attention alters the early cortical responses that support selective information processing. Moreover, these data facilitate the translation of results across different species and across experimental procedures that employ different behavioral training regimes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of PLoS Biology is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:a9h&genre=article&issn=15449173&ISBN=&volume=15&issue=6&date=20170627&spage=1&pages=1-38&title=PLoS Biology&atitle=Two%20different%20mechanisms%20support%20selective%20attention%20at%20different%20phases%20of%20training.&aulast=Itthipuripat%2C%20Sirawaj&id=DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001724
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries
    MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries
Header DbId: a9h
DbLabel: Academic Search Complete
An: 123828472
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Itthipuripat%2C+Sirawaj%22">Itthipuripat, Sirawaj</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> itthipuripat.sirawaj@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cha%2C+Kexin%22">Cha, Kexin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Byers%2C+Anna%22">Byers, Anna</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Serences%2C+John+T%2E%22">Serences, John T.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo><i> jserences@ucsd.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22PLoS+Biology%22">PLoS Biology</searchLink>. 6/27/2017, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p1-38. 38p. 2 Diagrams, 2 Charts, 9 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22PSYCHOLOGY%22">PSYCHOLOGY</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SOCIAL+sciences%22">SOCIAL sciences</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SENSORY+perception%22">SENSORY perception</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22NOISE+control%22">NOISE control</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SIGNAL+processing%22">SIGNAL processing</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Selective attention supports the prioritized processing of relevant sensory information to facilitate goal-directed behavior. Studies in human subjects demonstrate that attentional gain of cortical responses can sufficiently account for attention-related improvements in behavior. On the other hand, studies using highly trained nonhuman primates suggest that reductions in neural noise can better explain attentional facilitation of behavior. Given the importance of selective information processing in nearly all domains of cognition, we sought to reconcile these competing accounts by testing the hypothesis that extensive behavioral training alters the neural mechanisms that support selective attention. We tested this hypothesis using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure stimulus-evoked visual responses from human subjects while they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of ~1 month. Early in training, spatial attention led to an increase in the gain of stimulus-evoked visual responses. Gain was apparent within ~100 ms of stimulus onset, and a quantitative model based on signal detection theory (SDT) successfully linked the magnitude of this gain modulation to attention-related improvements in behavior. However, after extensive training, this early attentional gain was eliminated even though there were still substantial attention-related improvements in behavior. Accordingly, the SDT-based model required noise reduction to account for the link between the stimulus-evoked visual responses and attentional modulations of behavior. These findings suggest that training can lead to fundamental changes in the way attention alters the early cortical responses that support selective information processing. Moreover, these data facilitate the translation of results across different species and across experimental procedures that employ different behavioral training regimes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of PLoS Biology is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=a9h&AN=123828472
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001724
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 38
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: PSYCHOLOGY
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SOCIAL sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SENSORY perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: NOISE control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SIGNAL processing
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Itthipuripat, Sirawaj
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cha, Kexin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Byers, Anna
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Serences, John T.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 27
              M: 06
              Text: 6/27/2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15449173
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 15
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: PLoS Biology
              Type: main
ResultId 1