A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention Implemented in Ohio Public Health Clinics, 2013.

Bibliographic Details
Title: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention Implemented in Ohio Public Health Clinics, 2013.
Authors: Agaku, Israel iagaku@cdc.gov, Olaiya, Oluwatosin xdg1@cdc.gov, Quinn, Celia fyq6@cdc.gov, Tong, Van1 vct2@cdc.gov, Kuiper, Nicole2 nKuiper@cdc.gov, Conrey, Elizabeth ElizabethJ.Conrey@odh.ohio.gov, Sharma, Andrea aec4@cdc.gov, Mullen, Sierra Sierra.Mullen@odh.ohio.gov, Dee, Deborah DDee@cdc.gov
Source: Maternal & Child Health Journal. Dec2015, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p2654-2662. 9p. 5 Charts.
Subject Terms: *CONFIDENCE, *COUNSELING, *INTERVIEWING, *RESEARCH methodology, *PATIENT education, *PERSONNEL management, *PUBLIC health, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *RESEARCH funding, *SMOKING cessation, *THEMATIC analysis, *HUMAN services programs, *DATA analysis software
Geographic Terms: OHIO
Abstract: Objectives: In 2006, the state of Ohio initiated the implementation of a brief smoking cessation intervention (5As: Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange) in select public health clinics that serve low-income pregnant and post-partum women. Funds later became available to expand the program statewide by 2015. However, close to half of the clinics initially trained stopped implementation of the 5As. To help guide the proposed statewide expansion plan for implementation of the 5As, this study assessed barriers and facilitators related to 5As implementation among clinics that had ever received training. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising semi-structured interviews with clinic program directors (n = 21) and a survey of clinic staff members (n = 120), to assess implementation-related barriers, facilitators, training needs, and staff confidence in delivering the 5As. Results: Semi-structured interviews of program directors elucidated implementation barriers including time constraints, low self-efficacy in engaging resistant clients, and paperwork-related documentation challenges. Facilitators included availability of community referral resources, and integration of cessation interventions into the clinic workflow. Program directors believed they would benefit from more hands-on training in delivering the 5As. The survey results showed that a majority of staff felt confident advising (61 %) or referring clients for tobacco dependence treatment (74 %), but fewer felt confident about discussing treatment options with clients (29 %) or providing support to clients who had relapsed (30 %). Conclusions: Time constraints and documentation issues were major barriers to implementing the 5As. Simplified documentation processes and training enhancements, coupled with systems change, may enhance delivery of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Maternal & Child Health Journal is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:10927875
DOI:10.1007/s10995-015-1786-y
Published in:Maternal & Child Health Journal
Language:English