Pros and Cons of the No Kings Act: Holding presidents accountable vs. a congressional overreach.

Source: Congressional Digest. Jan2025, Vol. 104 Issue 1, p26-26. 1p.

Subjects: LEGISLATIVE bills, SCHUMER, Charles E., 1950-, FEDERAL laws, PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law), BALANCE of power, EQUALITY, UNITED States. Congress

Decentralized Clinical Trials: The Legal Implications of Conducting Research Remotely.

Authors: Chmielewski, Monica Renee, Boubker, Jessa M.

Source: Health Lawyer. Dec2024, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p1-25. 25p. 1 Color Photograph.

Subject Terms: *CLINICAL trials, *FEDERAL laws

ANTICOMMANDEERING & INDIAN AFFAIRS LEGISLATION.

Authors: TWEEDY, ANN E.¹

Source: Harvard Journal on Legislation; 2025, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p39-83, 45p

REMOVING TORTS.

Authors: GREY, BETSY J.¹

Source: Harvard Journal on Legislation; 2025, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p135-178, 44p

CONGRESS AND THE SHIFTING SANDS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.

Authors: Walker, Christopher J.¹

Source: Widener Commonwealth Law Review; 2025, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p187-213, 27p

Helping Students to Organize Their Thoughts About the Erie Doctrine.

Authors: CASTO, WILLIAM¹

Source: Indiana Law Journal. 2024 Supplement, Vol. 99, p62-78. 17p.

Subject Terms: *FEDERAL laws, *STATE laws, *LAW students, *LAW schools, *LAW teachers

ANACHRONISTIC READINGS OF SECTION 1983.

Authors: Lindley, Tyler B.^1,2,3

Source: Alabama Law Review. 2024, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p897-953. 57p.

Subject Terms: *FEDERAL laws, *LITERARY errors & blunders, *CIVIL rights, *DAMAGES (Law), *PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law), *CAUSATION (Law)

Labor and Employment.

Authors: Martin II, W. Jonathan¹, Brownback, Patricia-Anne²

Source: Mercer Law Review. 2024, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p1261-1286. 26p.

Subject Terms: *FEDERAL laws, *LABOR laws, *EMPLOYEES, *WAGES

Geographic Terms: UNITED States

ELIDING CONSENT IN THE CASE OF PANDEMIC COUNTERMEASURES AUTHORIZED ONLY FOR EMERGENCY USE.

Authors: NOAH, LARS¹

Source: Indiana Law Review. 2024, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p83-121. 39p.

Subject Terms: *FEDERAL judges, *FEDERAL laws, *COVID-19 vaccines, *JOURNALISTS, *VACCINATION

The Finality of Reinstated Orders of Removal Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Authors: Klausner, Jonah¹

Source: University of Chicago Law Review. Jun2024, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p1197-1241. 45p.

Subject Terms: *Noncitizens, *Emigration & immigration, Federal laws, Federal judges

Geographic Terms: United States

A Regulatory Minefield: What Employers Should Know About Cannabis and the Workplace.

Authors: ORTIZ, JASON, REALL, ELAINE

Source: BusinessWest. 10/14/2024, Vol. 41 Issue 12, p30-38. 3p.

Subject Terms: *Growth industries, *Employers, *Scheduling, Federal laws

FEDERAL REGISTER.

Source: Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of the Federal Register). 10/15/2024, Vol. 89 Issue 199, pI-iii. 493p.

Subject Terms: *Government policy, Federal laws, Legal notice, Government publications

Company/Entity: United States. Office of the Federal Register

PANEL THREE: TEACHING AT THE INTERSECTION OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW COURSES.

Authors: Hammersley, Mia Montoya¹, Racehorse, Vanessa², Tanana, Heather³, Padilla, Nadine⁴, Torres, Gerald⁵

Source: Vermont Law Review; Winter2024, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p202-229, 28p

AN ORIGINALIST DEFENSE OF THE MAJOR QUESTIONS DOCTRINE.

Authors: RAMSEY, MICHAEL D.¹

Source: Administrative Law Review; Fall2024, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p817-856, 40p

Avoiding a "Nine-Headed Hydra": Intervention as a Matter of Right by Legislators in Federal Lawsuits After Berger.

Authors: Lawing, Taylor¹

Source: Vanderbilt Law Review. Jan2024, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p275-305. 31p.

Subject Terms: *FEDERAL laws, *LEGISLATORS, *STATE laws, *FEDERAL courts, *ACTIONS & defenses (Law), *INTERVENTION (Federal government)

THE SPECTER OF INDIAN REMOVAL: THE PERSISTENCE OF STATE SUPREMACY ARGUMENTS IN FEDERAL INDIAN LAW.

Authors: Allread, W. Tanner¹

Source: Columbia Law Review. Oct2023, Vol. 123 Issue 6, p1533-1610. 78p.

Subject Terms: Rule of law, Federal laws, Appellate courts, Forced removal of Native Americans, Constitutional law, Racism

Bump Stock Ban, the Abortion Pill and Social Media Regulation on the Docket: Garland v. Cargill, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, Moody v. NetChoice and Others.

Source: Supreme Court Debates. Mar2024, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p3-6. 4p.

Subjects: APPELLATE courts, UNITED States. Food & Drug Administration, MIFEPRISTONE, FEDERAL laws, PREGNANCY, GARLAND v. Cargill, FOOD & Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, MOODY v. NetChoice LLC, ALEXANDER v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, O'CONNOR-Ratcliff v. Garnier, LINDKE v. Freed, CITY of Grants Pass v. Johnson

Should Courts Defer to an Agency's Interpretation of Federal Law When Congress' Intent Is Unclear?

Source: Supreme Court Debates. Feb2024, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p27-35. 9p.

Subjects: UNITED States. Supreme Court, FEDERAL laws, ADMINISTRATIVE law, JUDICIAL review, STARE decisis, UNITED States. Congress

Should Courts Defer to an Agency's Interpretation of Federal Law When Congress' Intent Is Unclear?

Source: Supreme Court Debates. Feb2024, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p17-26. 10p.

Subjects: AGENCY (Law), UNITED States. Supreme Court, FEDERAL laws, UNITED States. Congress, STARE decisis, STATUTORY interpretation

FIFTH CIRCUIT HOLDING ON THE ABORTION PILL: The FDA's Amending of Mifepristone Guidelines Violated Federal Law.

Source: Supreme Court Debates. Apr2024, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p14-16. 3p.

Subjects: UNITED States. Food & Drug Administration, MIFEPRISTONE, LEGISLATIVE amendments, FEDERAL laws, SAFETY